Part 3: Prevention & Early Signals — Stopping “Runaway” Risk Before It Starts Part 1: Retiring the “Runaway” Label – Praxis Professional Part 2: The First 48 Hours — A Rapid-Response Playbook for “Runaway” (Endangered) Children – Praxis Professional North Star: Connection prevents crisis. Spot signals early, respond without blame, and build safety plans that make it easy to ask for help. Early Signals at Home Early Signals at School & Community Online Grooming: What It Looks Like Family Safety Plans (Template) Reducing Repeat Episodes After Recovery Printable Quick Checks…
Read MoreARTICLES
Part 2: The First 48 Hours — A Rapid-Response Playbook for “Runaway” (Endangered) Children
Part 2: The First 48 Hours — A Rapid-Response Playbook for “Runaway” (Endangered) Children Part 1: Retiring the “Runaway” Label – Praxis Professional Part 3: Prevention & Early Signals: Stop “Runaway” Risk Before It Starts North Star: Treat every missing “runaway” as endangered and act immediately. Mindset Shift Family & Caregiver Checklist (Hour 0–6) Schools & Community Actions (Hour 0–24) Law Enforcement & Child Welfare (Hour 0–48) Digital Evidence & Online Safety After Recovery: Stabilize & Re-Engage Sources Mindset Shift “Runaway” is not a low-risk category. It is an endangered…
Read MorePart 1: Retiring the “Runaway” Label
Part 1: Retiring the “Runaway” Label Part 2: The First 48 Hours — A Rapid-Response Playbook for “Runaway” (Endangered) Children – Praxis Professional Part 3: Prevention & Early Signals: Stop “Runaway” Risk Before It Starts North Star: ⭐⭐ Every time a child runs away, that is a cry for help. ⭐⭐ The Reality Behind the “Runaway” Label The Trafficking Risk We Can’t Ignore Missing From Care: An Acute Danger A Story We Can’t Forget Change the Word, Change the Response What To Do—Right Now FAQ Sources When a child goes…
Read MoreLCMS is theologically conservative but institutionally non-partisan.
The LCMS (Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod) is widely recognized as theologically and socially conservative, but institutionally it insists on being non-partisan. The pattern of language it uses to assert this has some consistent features worth unpacking. 1. Framing around Scripture, not Politics The LCMS emphasizes that its positions flow from the inerrancy of Scripture and confessional fidelity, not from any political agenda. When the Synod speaks on moral or social issues, it carefully couches its reasoning in biblical interpretation and confessional documents (e.g., the Book of Concord), avoiding references to party…
Read MoreGod Alone Works Salvation
The Lutheran Church—Missouri Synod (LCMS) deliberately distinguishes itself from “decisional theology” churches (such as many Baptist, Pentecostal, and evangelical traditions). The key difference comes down to how salvation is received and the role of human will in conversion. 1. LCMS Position: Monergism (God Alone Works Salvation) The LCMS is in the category of monergistic churches (“mono” = one, “ergon” = work). This means God alone works faith in the sinner’s heart through the means of grace (Word and Sacraments). LCMS teaches that people are by nature spiritually dead (Eph. 2:1).…
Read MoreAutomated Red Flag Systems for Human Trafficking Detection in Hotels: A Legally Defensible Framework
Introduction Hotels — particularly budget properties — have long been identified as common venues for human trafficking activity. Yet efforts to intervene often fail because staff lack structured tools for recognizing trafficking indicators in real time, and existing monitoring approaches sometimes raise legitimate legal and privacy concerns. By applying ASIS-style security risk management principles and aligning with DHS trafficking red flag frameworks, it is possible to design an automated monitoring system that both maximizes detection yield and minimizes legal blowback. The key is to focus on high-percentage, low-risk automated red…
Read MoreSponsor a GPU – Speed Justice for Survivors of Human Trafficking
The Crisis Every year, thousands of human trafficking survivors face long, complex legal battles to secure safety, restitution, and justice.For survivors rescued by our trusted network of private investigators, time is critical — yet legal document review can take weeks or even months, delaying safety and prolonging trauma. Our Mission We connect survivors directly to pro bono attorneys who fight for their rights.To support these attorneys, our nonprofit provides HIPAA-compliant AI-powered legal document review, accelerating the legal process while protecting client confidentiality. The bottleneck?We need high-performance GPUs to run secure…
Read MoreMutual Critiques: The Catholic Church, the United States, and Conservative Lutheranism
Criticism is often reciprocal, especially when institutions of substantial influence and power evaluate each other’s moral, ethical, and societal practices. Just as Martin Luther historically criticized the Catholic Church for its practice of indulgences, modern critics have targeted the Catholic Church for its extensive wealth and perceived worldly power. In a similar fashion, the Catholic Church itself critiques the United States on moral and ethical grounds, while the conservative Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod (LCMS) demonstrates an implicit support for American conservative governmental principles and traditions. This article examines these dynamic interactions…
Read MoreFrom Indulgences to Influence: Historical and Modern Critiques of Catholic Authority and Wealth
Martin Luther’s act of nailing his 95 Theses to the church door in Wittenberg in 1517 remains a potent historical image symbolizing resistance against institutional corruption and theological malpractice. Central among Luther’s criticisms was the Catholic Church’s sale of indulgences—documents promising remission of sin and reduced time in purgatory. Over 500 years later, similar critiques arise, examining the Catholic Church’s vast wealth, properties, and influence over personal and spiritual lives. This essay examines parallels and contrasts between Luther’s historical criticisms and contemporary critiques of the Catholic Church, exploring how conservative…
Read MoreThe divergence of the Boff Brothers mirrors divergence in society in general
Leonardo Boff and Clodovis Boff, two Brazilian brothers and Catholic priests, were among the leading voices in Liberation Theology—a movement that emerged in Latin America during the 1960s–1980s. Both initially worked closely together, advocating for the poor and critiquing structures of oppression within political and ecclesial systems. However, over time, they experienced a philosophical and theological divergence, particularly in how they balanced faith, theology, and Marxist social analysis. Here’s a breakdown of their philosophical parting of ways: 1. Common Ground in Liberation Theology (Early Years) In their early collaboration: Both…
Read More